———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Dante-Gabryell Monson
Date: Jun 9, 2007 5:18 PM
Subject: we forget to see what is in front of us , at a higher level of abstraction ?
I would be glad , if this can inspire you , if you could give me some feed back on this – and if this can connect to some of your work / if some collaboration could be foreseen
– I prefer presenting it informally :
In the last week , as I did some more internet browsing on topics such as Quantum physics , I have the feeling that Physicists forget to see what is just in front of us , and what we are using all the time ,
and is simple to see even though it might be at a higher degree of abstraction :
the processes and other abstract objects such as concepts that are all around us.
My current hypothesis that I already exposed to some of you ( I ll re-paste some conversations below )
is that abstract objects , including objectified processes , are also dimensions , and that they function and are all part of the same universal system.
In other words , a process dimension is a ” Brane ” of a certain order ,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brane_cosmology
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-brane
and as explained in my process dimensions axiom ,
http://oikoumene.coforum.net/processdimensions ( or see the yahoo groups links on that page )
there are process dimensions in process dimensions – there is a infinity of dimensions , and there are also flows , relations , etc –
Even dreams are part of it , at a higher level of abstraction.
So the structures we are , and the ones we develop , and the emergent negentropic process is actually a process of emergence related to all the other objects in the universe –
We could model this , and use this understanding to develop emergence / or ” visualize emergence ”
I also feel that asking ” why there is something ” is not as much the question as ” why this experience and not another ”
I feel that there is everything at all times , but that somehow we seem to limit ourself to a certain experience , possibly at first ( when understanding process dimensions ) through limitation by addiction , and then , possibly also to limitation by addiction to the string ( or ” brane ” of “n” value ) we might be experiencing : the direction of the flow of our CONSCIOUSNESS
—-
I want to further experiment with these models – as there is great potential – and I have the intention to create synergies with other interested individuals , such as you ?
This model has the potential of being a universal science as all knowledge and all relations can be included.
—
More and more questions could pop up – one that I have at the moment is how do they see each other ?
How do all objects , of all different abstraction levels , see each other ? ( and how can we then create a meta cortex , etc etc – details in past pasted conversations below )
I
s concept some kind of EMERGENT GRAVITY applicable to all objects of all levels of abstraction ?
possibly quantum gravity and emergent gravity could give some answers ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdS/CFT_correspondence
I have the feeling that all is aware of all at the same time – so they ( objects and objectified processes ) all see each other , and this can also be understood through process dimensions
But i still need to experiment with the axiom of process dimensions –
and would also like to experiment with a meta-cortex
and possibly you can help in developing such project ?
Ok , thats it for now
more below
greetings from Vilnius – or what seems to be vilnius at a certain level of abstraction , a certain ” brane ” we call ” real world ”
Dante